Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Dennis Novak vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Novak vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Dennis Novak vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Novak 1 - 0 Michalski
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Novak has won 49.12% of points on their second serve, while Michalski has won 50.66%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Novak, in recent form, has won 52.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 52.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.76% and 33.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Novak has saved 57.92% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 59.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Novak has won 54.55% of matches played (W/L 36/ 30), with Michalski winning 54.1% (W/L 33/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Novak has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 115/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 77/ 63). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 182/ 96), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Novak has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 25), where as Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.11% of matches (W/L 16/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Novak winning 1 times and Michalski being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Novak winning 2 and Michalski winning 0. The last match between Novak and Michalski was at the Nonthaburi 2 Challenger, 09-01-2024, First, Hard with Dennis Novak getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:42.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Novak and Michalski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Novak winning 0 times and Michalski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Novak winning 0, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Novak has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.67 while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 256.51.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Novak has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Novak has converted 40.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 46.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
208
Rank
85
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
367
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
62% (489-294)
Career Total W/L
62% (215-132)
48% (14-15)
YTD W/L
50% (15-15)
$838,895
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Dennis Novak | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:2:42 | 1:2:42 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (23/35) | 57% (28/49) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 91% (21/23) | 54% (15/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 92% (11/12) | 33% (7/21) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (27/49) | 9% (3/35) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Dennis Novak
Player
Daniel Michalski
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
92%
(
11 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
3 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
25
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Dennis Novak | Daniel Michalski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 48% (14/15) | 50% (15/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (34/32) | 50% (34/34) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (296/286) | 49% (317/326) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 14% (1/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (9/9) | 60% (12/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.27 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 78 | 43 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.21 |
| DFs Total | 65 | 66 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:37 | 1:54:25 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 347.93 | 330.8 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1177/1800) | 61% (1340/2179) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (799/1177) | 63% (842/1340) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (306/623) | 51% (425/839) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (81/201) | 47% (91/194) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (747/1855) | 41% (856/2087) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 48% (13/14) | 43% (10/13) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (13/27) | 50% (15/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 70% (7/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 50% (4/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 88% (17/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 12% (17/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 19% (16/3) | 0% (13/0) |
Dennis Novak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Cachin
Player
Dennis Novak
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
54 of
104)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Dennis Novak
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Dennis Novak
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Alex Michelsen
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
77%
(
56 of
73)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Dan Added
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve %
60%
(
15 of
25)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
100%
(
10 of
10)
1st Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
18 of
25)
30
Total Points Won
8
|
6-0 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Dennis Novak
46%
(
41 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
7
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Dennis Novak
49%
(
32 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Gauthier Onclin
56%
(
36 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dennis Novak
Player
Lukas Neumayer
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
4-6 6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
August Holmgren
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Gerch
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Daniel Michalski
45%
(
35 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
34 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Daniel Michalski
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
17 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Norbert Gombos
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Branko Djuric
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
73%
(
24 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Novak Vs Michalski Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Novak are available here and Michalski photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Michalski
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
